On Immigration

A friends Facebook query: "Since we've all become so wise about immigration policy, I'd like to hear some solutions to our quandary: Tell me how YOU think the U.S. should process those seeking legal immigration as well as those coming illegally, in a way that is fair to US citizens AND would-be immigrants of all ages.

"This is a sincere question: What is YOUR solution? Keep it kind – no need to bash the current or former president, or anyone who disagrees with you."

My reply: "That's a no brainer unless you have a really bizarre opinion about what's 'fair' for attempted invaders, colonists and those who seek to make us pay some kind of POCgeld.

"What's FAIR is that every single Fake American is dumped unceremoniously across the WIP wall in Tijuana, we shoot anything that attempts to cross even if it's just a jackrabbit, and we tell Mexico that if they continue to wage what is effectively an act of war and conquest against us, they will feel the full might of the US military in total war.

"The only quandary involved is how long it will take the insensate and virtue singling Pharisees among the American people to realize that that's the only viable solution and that the sooner it happens the more humane for everyone it will be.

"To be fair (no pun intended) fairness isn't the only concern."

Fairness isn't the only concern. But sacrificing my own people so that another invasive population can ethnically cleanse is from the country we built and prosper on the ashes of my country isn't in the cards either.

Just as the blacks of South Africa haven't allowed the Afrikaners to have reservations, I don't think anyone lined up to conquer us is likely to make the offer to us that we made to the peoples we conquered.  Its either defend our country and repel the invaders, or surrender and see Americans become a historical people like the Romans or the Egyptians.

Anyway, he then asked if I thought it was really accurate to call them invaders and colonists.  My response was similar to the paragraph I posted above, but I resummarized the whole concept in a separate post:

"Isn't it curious that if there really is a child crisis at the border (which I highly doubt) that nobody's blaming the parents for dragging their kids across the desert, exposing them to human traffickers and all manner of abuse? Instead, they berate the invadees for not doing even MORE than charitably housing them until we can figure out what to do with them. Nobody's blaming the American government for advertising "free stuff" in the newspapers in Mexico? Nobody's blaming the Mexican government for telling its citizens to go to America, get as much of our money as they can, and send it home?

"In a fair world, invading colonists would simply be shot at the border on sight. As the burden of these bandidos becomes ever greater, that's going to be the moderate option before long, whether they foolishly brought their children with them or not.

"Invasion and colonization and looting (even with the consent of the treasonous government) is, after all, an act of war. Mexico has been in a state of de facto war against the American people for decades, and the American government has been complicit in it. They are traitors and deserve everything that will inevitably come to them when the zeitgeist continues it's turn."