Liberalism is now full of people like Sarah Jeong who are excused for nursing racial grievances despite the fact that they are influential, privileged, and by any reasonable standard much more powerful than the average person. These are people who aim hatred toward white people because of the color of their skin, and then we’re told that they can’t be racist because minorities have no power in a country where a black man just spent eight years as president of the United States. Jesse Jackson has no power? Al Sharpton? Ta-Nehisi Coates? Julian Bond? Leonard Pitts? Marc Lamont Hill? Charles Blow? Cornel West? Shaun King? Aiming hatred at white people is an industry in the United States and it pays well in money and attention. That’s why it’s such a growing field on the Left.
So, if you’re someone who is hated by a political party because of your skin color, what do you do about that?
Liberals certainly express a point of view about what minorities should do in that situation. They habitually falsely accuse Republicans of hating minorities and then say that means those voters are crazy if they don’t vote for them. Of course, their claim is not true. Conservatives overwhelmingly believe in judging people as individuals, by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. Still, this is how Democrats approach this issue.
So, should white people abandon the Democrats who hate their guts? Yes, they should. Why vote for someone who defends people who hate you because of the color of your skin? Why should any individual have to be a groveling apologist because he was born a certain color? Why support a party that is prejudiced against your white child because of the color of his skin? These guys are aiming the same kind of hate at white people as their ancestors used to do at black Americans -- and if you’re a white American who just shrugs your shoulders at that, you’re foolish.
You often hear this debate in America about whether people are “voting in their own interest.” If you are white, how is it in your interest to vote for a party full of people who denigrate you not because of your actions, but because of your race? How is it in your interest to support people who openly blame you for the problems in their lives because of your race and discount all of your hard-earned achievements because of imaginary “white privilege”? How is it in your interest to support people who gleefully say it will be a better country when more people like you are gone?He's actually wrong. It's not "liberals" who hate white people, although some "liberals" think that they can profit off of the hate for white people. It is Fake Americans pursuing their agenda of invading, colonizing and looting the nation of formerly British colonists and their descendants from their birthright. Although he's reaching, even somewhat blindly, towards the notion described below. We haven't yet reached the point where people want to accept reality, so they're masking it through proxies; things like kneeling for the anthem as an expression of identity conflict, for instance. But as quickly as they're moving, it'll be different sooner than he can imagine that we OPENLY have the White Party and the anti-White party in politics. When we do, Civil War 2.0 will be basically upon us and the question will be who makes who march in another Trail of Tears?
Nephi says that the wicked take the truth to be hard. In my experience EVERYONE takes the truth to be hard, if it contradicts something that they really want to believe, some pretty little lie that they use to prop up their notion of self, or believe because they can't face obvious realities without being emotionally overloaded. This issue is one where I've already crossed that particular Rubicon, so now I'm on the bleeding edge of political and social thought. But, alea iacta est—I'm quite certain that yet within my lifetime, the general, mainstream social and political mood will shift so far that I'll be left behind yet.
Let me quote (with a few minor edits for my specific audience) someone who gets this better than Hawkins in his article:
Apparently it's no longer a moral imperative to cuckishly posture about how color-blind and totally not racist you are, and how much you would LOVE to vote for a black candidate when doing so doesn't even slow down the 'liberal' attack dogs in their determined attempts to eradicate you. The next, and final, step for the likes of Mr. Hawkins is to realize that it isn't 'liberals' who are firmly prejudiced against whites, but non-whites pursuing their own competing interests.
Identity politics are now in effect. Get used to it and behave accordingly. The political system in the USA is now just like every other multinational political system in history. Defend your own, advance your own, or lose.
They don't care about your adopted black son. They don't care about your Chinese best friend. They don't care that you voted for Alan Keyes or Herman Cain or even Barack Obama. They don't care about your virtue-signaling or your virtue. They don't care what you think, what you do, or who you are. You are wearing the uniform of the enemy and you are in their way, so you are the enemy.
Consider this. Did any American soldier, throughout the entire course of World War II, ever stop to inquire of a German soldier his personal position on the invasion of Poland or how he voted concerning the Austrian Anschluss referendum of 1938 before shooting at him? That's about how much the average Chinese-"American", African-"American", Arab-"American", Mexican-"American", or Jewish-"American" thinks about what a genuine white Christian American happens to believe.
The various tribes inhabiting the USA pursue their own interests, as humans have done since the dawn of time. You would be well-advised to do the same.Do I regret that we are in a period of identity politics? Heck yeah I do. It's at best gauche, at worst, disastrous. But that's the inevitable result of a multi-ethnic empire who's alleged citizens belong to more than one identity. It's happened to every single multi-ethnic empire in history. Every. Single. One. The Hittites. The Persians. The Romans. The Parthians. The next wave of Persians. The Austrians. The Ottomans. The British. The Soviets. And now: the Americans.
What can be done to mitigate? The Fake Americans have to go back home. Think of the analogy of an invasive species. If they aren't managed, they will throw off the local ecosystem and the native species will die off. Think of the analogy of your neighbors. How much peace do you have with them if they can't respect boundaries and the social contract, and actually want to actively dispossess you from your home? On the other hand, how much peace can you have with them if they DO?
From the 16 Points:
5) The Alt Right is openly and avowedly patriotic and believes patriotism, regardless of your nation, to be a virtue. It supports all nations and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and migration.
9) The Alt Right believes that the hierarchy of decision making employed by humans is identity > culture > politics.
10) The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.
15) The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, or people. Every race, nation, and people has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.
16) The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.
No comments:
Post a Comment