Pages

Monday, August 13, 2018

The Lord Giveth, and the Lord Taketh Away

I've obviously read 2 Nephi 1 many times in the past, but I don't recall ever reading it with this particular perspective in mind; thinking about exactly how it applies to today.  For whatever reason, these verses really stuck out to me, because they are basically the details of the covenant made to those who inherit the Promised Land if they want to keep it.
5 But, said he, notwithstanding our afflictions, we have obtained a land of promise, a land which is choice above all other lands; a land which the Lord God hath covenanted with me should be a land for the inheritance of my seed. Yea, the Lord hath covenanted this land unto me, and to my children forever, and also all those who should be led out of other countries by the hand of the Lord.
6 Wherefore, I, Lehi, prophesy according to the workings of the Spirit which is in me, that there shall none come into this land save they shall be brought by the hand of the Lord.
7 Wherefore, this land is consecrated unto him whom he shall bring. And if it so be that they shall serve him according to the commandments which he hath given, it shall be a land of liberty unto them; wherefore, they shall never be brought down into captivity; if so, it shall be because of iniquity; for if iniquity shall abound cursed shall be the land for their sakes, but unto the righteous it shall be blessed forever.
8 And behold, it is wisdom that this land should be kept as yet from the knowledge of other nations; for behold, many nations would overrun the land, that there would be no place for an inheritance.
9 Wherefore, I, Lehi, have obtained a promise, that inasmuch as those whom the Lord God shall bring out of the land of Jerusalem shall keep his commandments, they shall prosper upon the face of this land; and they shall be kept from all other nations, that they may possess this land unto themselves. And if it so be that they shall keep his commandments they shall be blessed upon the face of this land, and there shall be none to molest them, nor to take away the land of their inheritance; and they shall dwell safely forever.
10 But behold, when the time cometh that they shall dwindle in unbelief, after they have received so great blessings from the hand of the Lord—having a knowledge of the creation of the earth, and all men, knowing the great and marvelous works of the Lord from the creation of the world; having power given them to do all things by faith; having all the commandments from the beginning, and having been brought by his infinite goodness into this precious land of promise—behold, I say, if the day shall come that they will reject the Holy One of Israel, the true Messiah, their Redeemer and their God, behold, the judgments of him that is just shall rest upon them.
11 Yea, he will bring other nations unto them, and he will give unto them power, and he will take away from them the lands of their possessions, and he will cause them to be scattered and smitten.
12 Yea, as one generation passeth to another there shall be bloodsheds, and great visitations among them; wherefore, my sons, I would that ye would remember; yea, I would that ye would hearken unto my words.
This is what the American nation can look forward to.  Being dispossessed by other nations.  Being scattered and smitten.  Great bloodsheds and visitations.

Why?  Because we have forsaken the great blessings that the Lord has given us.  America was a more or less righteous and Christian nation.  The Founding Fathers, indeed, believed that none other could endure the system of government that they set up without bringing it to ruin.  That is true no longer.  Now we're a people of post-Christian morality, who have allowed virulent anti-Christians to take over the halls of power and legislation.

People say that the Constitution is the highest law in the land.  The Constitution has been made a mockery of for many years, but in any case, it's not true.  The covenant God has instituted for those who inherit this land is the highest law of the land.  And that doesn't mean that those who dispossess us will be righteous.  The Nephites were dispossessed by the Lamanites for centuries before our people were brought by the Lord to dispossess them.

But it's clear that the only thing that could possibly save us at this point is a mass repentance.  Major societal changes need to be reversed and undone, or replaced with Christian ideals again.

I don't know about you, but I don't see that in the cards in the near term.  So, we need to prepare for the worst.

Thursday, August 9, 2018

Sarah Jeong

From my Facebook page:  (Read this first)  https://pjmedia.com/trending/the-liberal-hate-for-white-people-should-cost-them-big-at-the-ballot-box/
Liberalism is now full of people like Sarah Jeong who are excused for nursing racial grievances despite the fact that they are influential, privileged, and by any reasonable standard much more powerful than the average person. These are people who aim hatred toward white people because of the color of their skin, and then we’re told that they can’t be racist because minorities have no power in a country where a black man just spent eight years as president of the United States. Jesse Jackson has no power? Al Sharpton? Ta-Nehisi Coates? Julian Bond? Leonard Pitts? Marc Lamont Hill? Charles Blow? Cornel West? Shaun King? Aiming hatred at white people is an industry in the United States and it pays well in money and attention.  That’s why it’s such a growing field on the Left. 
So, if you’re someone who is hated by a political party because of your skin color, what do you do about that? 
Liberals certainly express a point of view about what minorities should do in that situation. They habitually falsely accuse Republicans of hating minorities and then say that means those voters are crazy if they don’t vote for them. Of course, their claim is not true. Conservatives overwhelmingly believe in judging people as individuals, by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. Still, this is how Democrats approach this issue. 
So, should white people abandon the Democrats who hate their guts? Yes, they should. Why vote for someone who defends people who hate you because of the color of your skin? Why should any individual have to be a groveling apologist because he was born a certain color? Why support a party that is prejudiced against your white child because of the color of his skin?  These guys are aiming the same kind of hate at white people as their ancestors used to do at black Americans -- and if you’re a white American who just shrugs your shoulders at that, you’re foolish. 
You often hear this debate in America about whether people are “voting in their own interest.” If you are white, how is it in your interest to vote for a party full of people who denigrate you not because of your actions, but because of your race? How is it in your interest to support people who openly blame you for the problems in their lives because of your race and discount all of your hard-earned achievements because of imaginary “white privilege”? How is it in your interest to support people who gleefully say it will be a better country when more people like you are gone?
He's actually wrong. It's not "liberals" who hate white people, although some "liberals" think that they can profit off of the hate for white people. It is Fake Americans pursuing their agenda of invading, colonizing and looting the nation of formerly British colonists and their descendants from their birthright. Although he's reaching, even somewhat blindly, towards the notion described below. We haven't yet reached the point where people want to accept reality, so they're masking it through proxies; things like kneeling for the anthem as an expression of identity conflict, for instance. But as quickly as they're moving, it'll be different sooner than he can imagine that we OPENLY have the White Party and the anti-White party in politics. When we do, Civil War 2.0 will be basically upon us and the question will be who makes who march in another Trail of Tears?

Nephi says that the wicked take the truth to be hard. In my experience EVERYONE takes the truth to be hard, if it contradicts something that they really want to believe, some pretty little lie that they use to prop up their notion of self, or believe because they can't face obvious realities without being emotionally overloaded. This issue is one where I've already crossed that particular Rubicon, so now I'm on the bleeding edge of political and social thought. But, alea iacta est—I'm quite certain that yet within my lifetime, the general, mainstream social and political mood will shift so far that I'll be left behind yet.

Let me quote (with a few minor edits for my specific audience) someone who gets this better than Hawkins in his article:
Apparently it's no longer a moral imperative to cuckishly posture about how color-blind and totally not racist you are, and how much you would LOVE to vote for a black candidate when doing so doesn't even slow down the 'liberal' attack dogs in their determined attempts to eradicate you. The next, and final, step for the likes of Mr. Hawkins is to realize that it isn't 'liberals' who are firmly prejudiced against whites, but non-whites pursuing their own competing interests. 
Identity politics are now in effect. Get used to it and behave accordingly. The political system in the USA is now just like every other multinational political system in history. Defend your own, advance your own, or lose. 
They don't care about your adopted black son. They don't care about your Chinese best friend. They don't care that you voted for Alan Keyes or Herman Cain or even Barack Obama. They don't care about your virtue-signaling or your virtue. They don't care what you think, what you do, or who you are. You are wearing the uniform of the enemy and you are in their way, so you are the enemy. 
Consider this. Did any American soldier, throughout the entire course of World War II, ever stop to inquire of a German soldier his personal position on the invasion of Poland or how he voted concerning the Austrian Anschluss referendum of 1938 before shooting at him? That's about how much the average Chinese-"American", African-"American", Arab-"American", Mexican-"American", or Jewish-"American" thinks about what a genuine white Christian American happens to believe. 
The various tribes inhabiting the USA pursue their own interests, as humans have done since the dawn of time. You would be well-advised to do the same.
Do I regret that we are in a period of identity politics? Heck yeah I do. It's at best gauche, at worst, disastrous. But that's the inevitable result of a multi-ethnic empire who's alleged citizens belong to more than one identity. It's happened to every single multi-ethnic empire in history. Every. Single. One. The Hittites. The Persians. The Romans. The Parthians. The next wave of Persians. The Austrians. The Ottomans. The British. The Soviets. And now: the Americans.

What can be done to mitigate? The Fake Americans have to go back home. Think of the analogy of an invasive species. If they aren't managed, they will throw off the local ecosystem and the native species will die off. Think of the analogy of your neighbors. How much peace do you have with them if they can't respect boundaries and the social contract, and actually want to actively dispossess you from your home? On the other hand, how much peace can you have with them if they DO?

From the 16 Points:
5) The Alt Right is openly and avowedly patriotic and believes patriotism, regardless of your nation, to be a virtue. It supports all nations and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and migration. 
9) The Alt Right believes that the hierarchy of decision making employed by humans is identity > culture > politics. 
10) The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means. 
15) The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, or people. Every race, nation, and people has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers. 
16) The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.

Friday, August 3, 2018

On numbers and the dating market

Here's a curious observation that I've recently thought about.  I spent a day recently as one of the two "priesthood guys" at Girls Camp.  For the most part, I like our young women.  Which is good.  I have two young men of my own who are friends, and potentially dating partners, for them, so I better like at least some of them.  But the experience brought a few things up.  I had this conversation with a few of the other camp leaders, many of whom are ward level young women's presidency members, stake level young women presidency members, or sometimes just moms of young women.  Let's see if I can recreate the gist of it.

What was the sex ratio of our recent youth conference? About 3:2, or in other words, there were half again as many girls who came as boys.  Has anyone been to an EFY recently or seen their registration numbers?  I haven't seen their official count, but I've been told repeatedly that it's pretty close to 2:1.  When they do the escort to dinner routine, each boy essentially has two girls with him, one on each arm.  I get similar reports about BYU, BYU-Hawaii, BYU-Idaho and SVU.  In fact, some of them sound even more grim if you're the parent of a girl; I've had reports of 3:1, 4:1 and even as high as 6:1.  I suspect those higher numbers are just exaggerated perceptions of people who don't really know what they're talking about.  But even being conservative, it's pretty fair to say that in the dating and marriage market for active LDS kids and young adults, there are a good three girls for every two boys.  That is, I don't think, a very controversial statement, and I expect that someone with better info than me might likely find that my estimate, handwavey and deliberately simplified as it is, is probably too conservative.  It might be a higher differential.  Math is math.  So far, no interpretation, speculation, or otherwise anything controversial, even if this is data that people may not want to face.  But where this gets interesting, of course, is when we start trying to figure out what does this all mean?

The obvious is that a lot of girls are going to go off to school, many if not most of them hoping to come back married, and they're not going to get married unless polygamy comes back.  The pool of available suitors is smaller than the pool of available girls, so the math simply doesn't allow for any other result.  While this isn't necessarily disastrous, anyone who pays any attention to how the real world works should admit two things: 1) the longer a woman waits to get married, in general, the less attractive as a potential spouse she becomes.  I don't mean necessarily less physically attractive (although obviously that does happen) but she becomes less enticing to potential suitors.  Who are even fewer and farther between once out of the college environment.  Which segues into 2) once out of the college environment, opportunities to meet, date and court potential suitors becomes drastically more sparse and difficult than it is in the college environment.  Now, I found that pointing out that women get less attractive as potential suitors was maybe a controversial statement to women who don't want to hear that while having some of these discussions at girls camp.  But it was obvious what was going on there; and I don't think at this point that we've delved into material that's not obviously true. Unpleasant, maybe.  But not controversial.  Of course, it gets worse (at least from the perspective of girls and women), and we have to confront some things that are obviously true, yet even more unpleasant to face.  Nephi says that the wicked take the truth to be hard, but in my experience, everyone takes the truth to be hard, especially if it contradicts some pet idea that you believe and don't want to give up for emotional or personal reasons.

So, let's dig a little deeper.  What does that mean?  Well, first off, let me make a small digression.  I see a growing trend among the women and girls of western civilization (which includes many members of the church, although some aspects of our unique subculture and doctrine serve as a mitigating factor which makes this less prevalent than it otherwise would be) where girls think that they can be whatever they want to be.  While not necessarily an adverse concept in it's own right, it has some dysgenic and dyscivil side effects, which can be devastating to the individual.  Because honestly, much of this is couched in feminist propaganda.  Women can do whatever men can do.  It's sexist to assume that women should embrace traditionally feminine qualities, or pursue traditionally feminine pursuits like cooking, home-making, child-rearing, etc.  Women no longer think that it's important to offer pleasant conversation and companionship, because they can be witty, sharp, sarcastic, demanding, pushy, bossy, dramatic, etc. with no brakes or filters on what they say and do.  The world now encourages this.  "You be you" is the refrain in a Diet Coke commercial that we see every time we go to the movies, which often gets translated in practice to rejecting the commandment that the Lord gave us through King Benjamin in Mosiah chapter 3 to put off the natural man rather than to embrace it.  You be you means doing what comes natural to you.  Reverting to the mean, if you will, your default behavior, not what you should be doing.

This suite of behavior: bossy, pushy, abrasive, entitled, often lazy and unmotived, etc. together creates a personality profile that I sometimes call "bratty princess syndrome" and I know a lot of girls (and fully grown women, for that matter) who exhibit it.  So, it's not really any of my business if anyone other than my wife, sister, daughter, or someone else in my immediate family has this problem, although I'll certainly tell my sons to keep an eye open for it.  But c'mon, girls—what do you think happens when you act like that?  How attractive do you think that makes you as a potential suitor to the guys you'll meet?  Yeah, it will reduce your attractiveness a ton.  The reality is that being pleasant, loyal and nice to be around is extremely high on the list of attractive qualities for most guys (second only to actually being physically attractive—although few guys will accept a trophy wife that is physically very attractive but not very pleasant to be around.)

And it gets even worse.  Because so many girls are conditioned by society to behave as if they are the scarce commodity in the dating market, many guys are either intimidated, frustrated, or demoralized by the whole affair of dealing with women who act like they actively don't want to date anyone or be taken seriously as a potential suitor.  They voluntarily basically drop out of the market, participate very little, if at all, and will only themselves be successful in finding and marrying someone if some girl who's a little more astute than others and able to mine markets that her competitors won't, can coax him back into the game by encouraging him that she's not like those other girls. By the way, this is a great way to not only find a guy for which there isn't a lot of active competition, but it will also engender in him a much higher than normal loyalty early on—it's not a bad strategy at all.  But in order to make it work, you actually have to not be like those other girls that turned him off in the first place.   Because if you can't tap into this market, your already badly lopsided pool of available suitors is now even worse because of this voluntary dropping out that many men will do because they have been burned, intimidated, or otherwise turned off by the harrowing hazards of navigating the modern dating/marriage market.

When my oldest son started dating his future wife, he would tell some kind of funny yet mostly kind of sad stories about his interactions with her room-mates out there in Rexburg.  And I'm paraphrasing my impression of several conversations I had with him a year ago now; I'm not sure that the details hold up 100%, but the gist of it absolutely does.  They frequently lamented and were in fact kind of bitter that they were coming up on the end of their school careers, and yet had had no success finding someone "like him."  One of them even rather clumsily made a half-hearted attempt to peel him off and see if he'd rather date her (not at all.)  They were resentful.  They were frustrated.  And they were scared.  Because reality had caught up with them.  Because what my son noticed (and said) was quite honestly that if they wanted to attract a guy "like him" then they had done absolutely nothing to make of themselves the kind of girl that a guy like him would find attractive.  Some of them didn't even meet the minimum threshold of demonstrating that living the Gospel was a priority to them, and even those who did had various stages of bratty princess syndrome.  There really wasn't any way that a guy like him was ever going to take them seriously as potential suitors.  And as that reality was starting to sink in, probably too late for most of them to change in time to take advantage of the opportunities that they had quite literally (albeit unconsciously) spurned while being students at BYU-I, they realized that what had already been a difficult task was about to get an order of magnitude more difficult.  Although probably not consciously, at some level they thought all they had to do was show up and Prince Charming would ride immediately to her side, flash a big smile and invite her to hop in his car so they could swing by the temple on their way towards riding into the sunset.  They were starting to realize that unless something happened soon, they could actually be facing the reality that they weren't going to find anyone to marry them that they considered an eligible suitor.

This is true of men and boys too, of course.  If you want to marry a certain kind of girl, you have to be a certain kind of man.  But boys are told that all the time.  It's not new news to boys.  And the odds aren't unfavorable to boys either.  If it's important for boys, it's probably much more important for girls.  I don't understand why in the world a girl or young woman, facing already odds that are not good, would deliberately make them even worse by engaging in bratty princess syndrome behavior, and generally acting like they don't want to be taken seriously as wife material.  But many, many of them do.  I guess people buy lottery tickets too and actually think that they may win.  Maybe they are in denial about the math and think that they will be the exceptions.  Good luck with that.

There are three things that I personally would encourage anyone who asks my advice to do.  First, get close to the Spirit.  Invite it into your life and make sure that it stays there by being as worthy and righteous as you can.  Statistics are all well and good, but the Lord can certainly make the statistically improbable happen without too much trouble if he wants to.

Secondly, pray to find an eternal companion.  Getting blessings from the Lord is not like walking onto a car lot, where pushy salesmen come up and follow you around asking you if they can help you.  The scriptures command you to ask if you want to receive and knock if you want it to be opened, not just wander around in the neighborhood hoping that things will fall into place for you.  Fast and pray specifically to find a worthy companion that you can marry.

And thirdly (and I don't know that this order means anything, because they are all about equally important) be the kind of girl that would attract the kind of man you want to attract.  You can't have a weak testimony that you make no effort to grow and expect to marry a spiritual giant who will carry you spiritually.  You can't be abrasive and demanding and expect to marry a man who is thoughtful and accommodating.  You can't have demonstrated no interest in developing skills that will make you a successful wife and mother if you expect to marry a man who has skills that will make him a successful husband and father.

Reject bratty princess syndrome.  Be humble.  Be thoughtful.  Be pleasant and fun to be around.  You do that, and you'll find that opportunities will come your way repeatedly that your brattier, more entitled sisters simply will not get.  Not only that, you'll be a better person, a better wife, a better mother, and happier in every respect anyway.

Monday, July 16, 2018

Judah and Ephraim, by a non-member Jew

I've blogged before about this many times.  Sigh.

Ron Unz, a Jewish-American (and I actually mean that; despite his ethnic heritage, I happily welcome him as an American and not another ethnic group pretending to be American) writes the rather lengthy but vastly important treatise on the influence of Jews on Western civilization.  To the detriment, especially, of the latter.

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-oddities-of-the-jewish-religion/

The narrative of the poor, picked on Jew, is one of the biggest lies ever told.  Actually, the entire American Pravda series is quite remarkable.  You should read them all.

Thursday, June 28, 2018

On Immigration

A friends Facebook query: "Since we've all become so wise about immigration policy, I'd like to hear some solutions to our quandary: Tell me how YOU think the U.S. should process those seeking legal immigration as well as those coming illegally, in a way that is fair to US citizens AND would-be immigrants of all ages.

"This is a sincere question: What is YOUR solution? Keep it kind – no need to bash the current or former president, or anyone who disagrees with you."

My reply: "That's a no brainer unless you have a really bizarre opinion about what's 'fair' for attempted invaders, colonists and those who seek to make us pay some kind of POCgeld.

"What's FAIR is that every single Fake American is dumped unceremoniously across the WIP wall in Tijuana, we shoot anything that attempts to cross even if it's just a jackrabbit, and we tell Mexico that if they continue to wage what is effectively an act of war and conquest against us, they will feel the full might of the US military in total war.

"The only quandary involved is how long it will take the insensate and virtue singling Pharisees among the American people to realize that that's the only viable solution and that the sooner it happens the more humane for everyone it will be.

"To be fair (no pun intended) fairness isn't the only concern."

Fairness isn't the only concern. But sacrificing my own people so that another invasive population can ethnically cleanse is from the country we built and prosper on the ashes of my country isn't in the cards either.

Just as the blacks of South Africa haven't allowed the Afrikaners to have reservations, I don't think anyone lined up to conquer us is likely to make the offer to us that we made to the peoples we conquered.  Its either defend our country and repel the invaders, or surrender and see Americans become a historical people like the Romans or the Egyptians.

Anyway, he then asked if I thought it was really accurate to call them invaders and colonists.  My response was similar to the paragraph I posted above, but I resummarized the whole concept in a separate post:

"Isn't it curious that if there really is a child crisis at the border (which I highly doubt) that nobody's blaming the parents for dragging their kids across the desert, exposing them to human traffickers and all manner of abuse? Instead, they berate the invadees for not doing even MORE than charitably housing them until we can figure out what to do with them. Nobody's blaming the American government for advertising "free stuff" in the newspapers in Mexico? Nobody's blaming the Mexican government for telling its citizens to go to America, get as much of our money as they can, and send it home?

"In a fair world, invading colonists would simply be shot at the border on sight. As the burden of these bandidos becomes ever greater, that's going to be the moderate option before long, whether they foolishly brought their children with them or not.

"Invasion and colonization and looting (even with the consent of the treasonous government) is, after all, an act of war. Mexico has been in a state of de facto war against the American people for decades, and the American government has been complicit in it. They are traitors and deserve everything that will inevitably come to them when the zeitgeist continues it's turn."

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Of Idolatry and Holocaustianity (Or Ephraim and Judah part 2.5? Part 3?)

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2018/06/darkstream-wrong-about-hitler.html

And the follow-up:

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2018/06/stalins-strike-historians-view.html

Another interesting post or two, reviewing some of the contents of what sounds like a fascinating book.  What's surprising to me is that while it took the better part of a lifetime to happen, the entire edifice of the idolatrous false religion of Holocaustianity is crashing down with surprising rapidity; kind of like the fall of Communism.  It doesn't take a genius, when he hears a handful of inconvenient facts (like the fact that Auschwitz was originally claimed to have been the site of the death of 4 million Jews; later revised down to 1 million.  What happened to the other three million?  The 6 million total never changed.  Also: like the claim that 6 million Jews were dying has been seen in print (with my own eyes) as long ago as 1919; many years before the rise of Nazism.) to start to wonder what else about the Holocaust narrative doesn't add up.

Add to that a quick look at how many Ashkenazi Jews were involved in the Communist overthrow of Russia (the First Party was so Jewish that the Bolshevik Revolution can pretty fairly be called a Jewish coup which stole Russia from the Russians.  Solzhenitsyn later claimed that two thirds of the secret police in the Ukraine were Jewish.  Even Churchill said that with the exception of Lenin, all of the leading figures of the Bolshevik Revolution were Jewish (Lenin was actually one quarter Jewish.)

Isaiah 11:13 (which is quoted by Nephi) says that it won't be until the Millennial Day that "The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim."  Until the Second Coming, Ephraim will envy Judah in vain, and Judah will "vex" Ephraim.  Look at my prior post which postulated that for all intents and purposes, Western Civilization, especially northern European (and its descendants in North America, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, etc.) are equivalent to Ephraim. (Part 1 and Part 2.)

I once made a metaphorical comparison that the Diaspora Jews are like the bratty princess archetype that gets booted by her tough guy boyfriend, and then becomes the pscyho ex that can't leave him alone.  Russia is the tough ex boyfriend in this scenario, and America is the pathetic orbiting beta male who hangs around white-knighting and desperate for any scraps of affection that he can get (which aren't many).  This metaphor actually explains most of the geopolitical interaction between superpowers for the last 125 or so years.  With the exception of the Japanese and the Chinese, who've had little to no involvement with the Jews.

This shouldn't be surprising, really.  It's a point of LDS doctrine, spelled out clearly in the Book of Mormon that the Jews were the only nation on earth wicked enough to reject their Savior.  Modern Judaism is the direct, lineal descendant of Phariseeism, which prevailed over other Jewish ideologies after the Savior's time, went to Babylon and became, if anything, even more corrupted than the Pharisees were.  The Talmud is shockingly brazen at times in its attempts to "legalize" doing whatever you really want to do rather than what the Law clearly says, up to and including offering various justifications for pedophilia and the rampant exploitation of Gentiles.  And we see, although only dimly because it's often hidden from us, how much of this modern Judaism still pushes.  Read Shirley Temple's autobiography or Judy Garland's biography for just a tiny glimpse into what happens, as well as notice, as did Larry David in a monologue on Saturday Night Live, the odd preponderance of Jews implicated in the #MeToo movement; something on the order of 75% of all those implicated. Add to that mow much of the movement in politics, in the courts, in academia and in entertainment has been deliberately formulated to erode our freedoms and destroy our Christian culture, and how much our economy is built on usury that was considered immoral before the Ellis Island influx of Fake Americans, and you begin to see dimly the disturbing trend of hostility towards the natives people of the West from the Jews living among them.  If you see how much their politicians have also been responsible for the radical change in immigration law and the flooding of our countries with hostile alien warbands ready to cause untold damage once the economy and the general rule of law fail, as they certainly must do, much like what happened in 4th Nephi prior to the coming of the Savior, and it is apparent that the Diaspora Jews collectively (not individually, necessarily, but if you look at their voting record, you'll see how many of them passively support this looting and destruction of America by their own elites).  They have not been good guests in the home countries in which they've lived.  In fact, they've been terminal parasites.

Now, no doubt, what happened was according to the Lord's plan, or at least according to his allowance for the evil of men.  And I'm certainly no Hitler apologist; he was an evil man, promoting an evil ideology, and President Heber J. Grant condemned him (and Mussolini, and Lenin and Stalin, and Roosevelt, and anyone who promoted any socialist doctrine, for that matter) in no uncertain terms.

But the fact is that Hitler was not the Ultima Thule of evil, in spite of decades of propaganda to that effect.  Stalin was a much worse, and much more evil dictator, and we were quite unreasonably friendly with him (the depth to which the Soviets had penetrated our own government, as revealed by the Venona papers, probably explains this.)  And the Holocaust, whether it really happened more or less as we've been taught, or whether that's mostly a con job and the Jewish led Soviet occupation forces actually brutalized and murdered many more Germans than Germans murdered Jews (which I feel is quite likely) served its purpose in God's plan as well for the gathering of Israel to Israel.  But it would have been much better for us had we allied with Germany against Stalin and then fought the Cold War against the Nazis rather than the Soviets.

Now, after that rather dismal appraisal of Jews in America (and elsewhere in the West, for that matter) I'll point out that all is not lost for the tribe of Judah, of course.  We know from prophecy that they will not accept Christ until the Second Coming, at least in significant numbers, but there is one thing that they can do which is consistent with the Lord's plan for them, which will prepare them spiritually and temporally for that moment: go home to Israel.

Now, I've only personally met a couple of Israelis in my life.  But here's some more (again from Vox Day) about the Jews in Israel.  This is also based heavily on comments from actual Israelis that back up what he claims, and the few Israelis I've met in the past also tend to fit this pattern.  I expect it represents reality, to a great degree, because the difference is skin in the game.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2018/04/mailvox-it-is-good-for-jews.html

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2018/05/skin-in-game.html

There's hope yet for the errant sons of Judah.  But the best plan, both for Judah and for Ephraim is that they go home to their homes and leave us to run our homes to our satisfaction.  Mixed together, there is little peace between Judah and Ephraim, even if Judah is only 2% or so of the population here.